Know who's behind what you're reading

Credibility context wherever you read — on the accounts, channels, and repos behind the posts, videos, and articles in front of you — filtered by the people whose judgment you actually trust.

Beta

Trust Circles & Inline Context

See what the people you trust have said — right in your feed.

Key Features

  • Choose whose judgment you see first; the full picture is one click away
  • What your circle has said about an account, channel, or repo appears inline as you read
  • Ask for context on an account nobody has covered yet — free, no wallet
  • Sidepanel shows who said it, what they staked, and any evidence they pointed to

Use Cases

Check an account before you follow, reply, or share
See who is behind a post that is spreading fast
Tell a real account from one impersonating it

In this made-up example, a reader taps the Hive Mind badge on the profile picture of a fictional account, Example News Desk, and the side panel opens. Two people the reader follows weighed in: three people back that the account is trusted for local news and one disputes it; one person tags it misleading and two dispute that. Hive Mind doesn't rate anyone.

ExampleA made-up account. On real pages, every line is someone who put something behind it. Hive Mind doesn't rate anyone.

Follow the Trail in the Explorer

The full picture on any account, site, or topic.

Key Features

  • See who said what about a source, and what they staked on it
  • See any evidence a curator pointed to — and who disagreed
  • Browse communities: the topics enough people have weighed in on to be worth reading
  • On rankings and list pages, coordinated accounts count once, and ten times the stake isn't ten times the weight
  • Add your own claim, or back one that already exists

Use Cases

Check an account before you follow or share it
See whether a dispute is one loud voice or many
Track how the people you trust view a source over time
Hive Mind Explorer showing a profile page with claims, who made them, and what they staked

See who has weighed in on a source, and what they staked on it.

Coming next

The claims inside the post

Today the context is about the source. Next, it reaches the claims inside the thing that's spreading.

  • The consequential claims picked out of an article, post, or video, confirmed by a person before they count
  • Who backs each one and who disputes it, so a disagreement reads as a disagreement
  • The evidence each side brings, and whether people you trust think it holds up
  • The reason a curator gave, not just the label — so you can judge the argument

Where We've Got You Covered

Multiple surfaces. One trust network.

Browser Extension

What people you trust have said, on X, YouTube, GitHub, and any site

Explorer

Follow any source in depth: who weighed in, what they staked, and why

Also covered: contracts and addresses

The same context follows you onto block explorers, for the times you need it.

  • Verification status, proxy/upgrade detection, and deployer for any contract
  • "Audited by" findings bound to the exact implementation they cover
  • A heads-up when the implementation recently changed — a fresh upgrade can invalidate a prior audit
  • Findings and upgrade history on the contract page in the Explorer
  • Shown right on Etherscan, Basescan, Blockscout, and more